DreamLabs
DreamLabs
[Beyond v0]
v0 is the best interface generator there is — and an interface is not an application. We build the backend, auth, and data layer underneath your v0 screens and ship it as a production Next.js app.
Free migration audit[Why it stalls]
v0 deserves its reputation. It produces genuinely good Next.js App Router code with Tailwind and shadcn/ui, the components are accessible and conventional, and the design taste is better than most teams get from a first pass. We use it. Skipping two weeks of front-end scaffolding is real value, and if you are looking at a prototype that looks like a finished product, that is v0 doing its job.
The gap is that v0 is a front-end tool, and a product is mostly not front end. What comes back is screens, wired to mock data or a thin route handler that returns a hard-coded array. Almost everything a real application needs is still missing: a database with a designed schema, authentication and session handling, server-side authorization, input validation, payments with verified webhooks, background jobs, transactional email, rate limiting, tests, environments, and observability. It is the two-thirds of the work that never demos.
There is a second, quieter issue. v0 generates screens independently, so each one arrives with its own approach to state, navigation, and data fetching. Nine screens can mean nine slightly different ways to load the same object. Nothing here is broken — it is the cleanest starting point in this whole category, with almost nothing to undo — but assembling generated screens into an application is a design job that no generator has done for you.
[How it works]
[01]
We review the generated screens and separate what is real from what is placeholder, then design the application underneath: the data model your interface already implies, the permission model your product needs, the integrations in scope, and the boundaries between them. Because the front end is already built, this phase is unusually concrete — the specification is on screen — and it produces a fixed scope.
[02]
Database schema with real constraints and migrations, authentication and session handling, server-side authorization, validated server actions and route handlers, and the integrations your product depends on. This is the two-thirds of the application that v0 was never meant to produce, and it is where most of the engagement's effort goes.
[03]
Screens get connected to real data, and the per-screen duplication gets consolidated into shared components, typed models, and one data-fetching pattern. Loading, empty, and error states — the ones a prototype never needs — get designed and implemented. Tests and CI go in alongside so the app is verifiable from this point on.
[04]
We deploy to your own Vercel or Cloudflare account with staging and production environments, monitoring, and alerting, connect your domain, and hand over the repository with documentation any Next.js engineer can start from. From there you can keep generating new screens in v0 and bring them into the codebase through review.
[Where you land]
You land on the stack v0 already writes for, built out properly: Next.js App Router with TypeScript, a Postgres database through Neon or Supabase with a typed query layer, authentication that fits your product, server actions and route handlers with validation and authorization, Stripe with verified webhooks where payments are involved, and tests, CI/CD, and monitoring around all of it. Hosting stays on Vercel or moves to Cloudflare or your own cloud, whichever suits your traffic and budget.
You almost never need a separate backend service. A Next.js application with a well-designed data layer handles a great deal of product, and keeping one codebase means one deploy, one type system, and one place to look when something breaks.
[Other platforms]
[Smaller engagements]
Migrating off FlutterFlow, Bubble, Webflow, or Airtable instead? See no-code migration →
[FAQs]
The application. v0 produces the interface — accurately, and often beautifully — but a product also needs a database with a designed schema, authentication and sessions, server-side authorization, validated server actions, payments with verified webhooks, email, background jobs, rate limits, tests, environments, and monitoring. In most v0 engagements the front end is the smallest remaining piece of work, which is exactly why starting there was smart.
Yes, and normally we do. The design is the part v0 is best at and the part your stakeholders have already signed off on. What changes behind it is consolidation — nine variations of the same card become one shared component — plus the states a prototype never has to show: loading, empty, error, permission-denied, and offline.
Yes. v0 is a great fit for a codebase that already has structure: generate a new screen, bring it in through a pull request, adapt it to the shared components and types, let the tests and review catch what is off. That is a healthy workflow and much of our own front-end work starts the same way.
For most products, one Next.js application with server actions, route handlers, and a well-designed database layer is the right answer — fewer moving parts, one deployment, one type system. A separate service earns its place when you have real background processing, a second consumer like a mobile app, or workloads that need to scale independently. We make that call during the audit rather than by default.
Prototypes start at $6,000 and full MVPs at $15,000. Most v0 projects run about 6 weeks and land around $20,000 all-in, versus roughly $200,000 and 6 months at a traditional agency. Having the interface already built is a genuine discount on the timeline: your screens answer the product questions that usually consume the first month of a greenfield build. The audit produces a fixed quote before any code is written.
[Interested?]